| Long Live Rock!!! Adam |
| Thanks for all your hard work...........I'm looking forward to this all being over with and for the extinction of child pornography!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
| First, thank you for putting this site up. I believe Pete is innocent as well. All the media did here in Canada and all of North America was sensationalize the worst aspects and since have done little or nothing to report facts that have come forward since then. It's nice to find something that offers a balanced view. One thing to note though: I have no documentation supporting this but remember reading comments about his suspected abuse from Pete as early as 1994 when the production of "The Who's Tommy" had it's run in Toronto. He stated then that he thought he'd been sexually abused as a child and added that it was those images that come to him when writing that fueled the writing of Tommy in the first place. As I said, I've no documentation supporting this but recall it clearly from when I saw the production and read the literature surrounding it. If I'm able to find anything tangible I'll be sure to pass the information on. Again, my thanks for putting up this site in support of an innocent man. Sincerely, Brian in Canada |
| During a panel meeting of RSPCA workers, a folder of cruelty cases complete with photographs was placed on the table. I watched with interest as people were warned the photographs were explicit and not recommended for animals lovers to view. Interestingly, only two of the team of ten looked through that folder. One was me, an animal lover and owner. Does that make me more likely to commit an act of cruelty against an animal than anyone else? The law of Incitement is vague and laws of acts of a sexual nature are vague and incredibly hypocritical. The Worldwide Web has the ability to educate and inform where other media formats are biased and controlled, but the British Justice system is lagging behind this new technology. The law that is being used against Pete suggests viewing such material is almost equal to committing the act shown, yet little is being done to curb the originators of these sites. If any good can come out of this fiasco, it will be that the current law will be debated and that sites may be traced and closed down. I hope this doesn't stop Pete from investigating matters that he obviously cares deeply about, enough to act in the innocence that information must be sought in order to be informed and educate others. Researchers are the people's champions and without them, decent ordinary people are wholly ignorant of such unspeakable acts as child rape and abuse. To research Paedophilia shows a strong, moral, and inquiring mind, not a foolish one. Stay strong Alison |
| PASCAL a French WHO fan |
| Toni Stern |
| I wrote a message earlier before i started looking at the site, and after having viewed it, i applaud all those involved in making this site. The facts that were written, all the people who supported him, and the list of charities he is involved with. Now this really doesn't sound like a man who will harm children. Thanks for backing this man. My hero PETE TOWNSHEND. Thomas Q. |
| Shaun, you are correct that one shouldn't be judged from a single event in one's life. Pete has no history of supporting child pornography and in fact has done many, many good deeds. My original comment was to point out the incredibly bad judgment he used -- and that's even if you accept his explanation of researching the subject. I don't doubt that his explanation is the truth, but again his judgment was sorely lacking. Nancy, I don't want to engage in a technical discussion of what constitutes 'downloading', we'll just agree to disagree on that. Your other contention is that giving one's credit card information to child pornographers -- upstanding citizens that they are -- in order to enter their Website may not result in a charge to said card. Uh huh, right. And the person giving their credit card information in the aforementioned circumstances can have the reasonable expectation that they won't be charged on the card. I'm having a hard time accepting this thesis. And finally, I really feel disheartened by this revelation about Pete. I'm still a fan of his and The Who, and will remain so. We all make errors of judgment, but Pete's choice was one that he should have avoided. In our zeal to defend Pete from accusations that are perhaps not true, we still need to deal with what he in fact did -- and that's what I'm doing. Ken |
| Massimo |
| Thanks again for the site, Mike from Massachusetts, USA |
| Opening a web page is NOT the same as downloading. Downloading is saving an image as a file on your computer. If you do not download (save) an image from a website, you will not be able to see that image after you leave the web page you had opened. Pete said he used a credit card to ENTER a website. Some websites use credit card numbers to establish that someone is over 18. If you do not know FOR A FACT that the website actually charged Pete's credit card any amount, don't assume that he "paid for porn". (The rest of my views are in the Essay section.) Nancy Mantick |
| From first hand experience, I have learned that you can think you know someone, but what they are behind their own closed doors may be completely different. Pete has always been open and honest been about himself, good and bad. I've never seen him try to hide behind a goodie tooshoes facade. Quite the opposite, in fact. He definately posesses a dark, seedy, and I might add sick side to himself. ( read A Horse's Neck just for a taste of what lurkes in his mind) I've always admired his openess to his fans and the public, being the first to admit to his human weaknesses and fallings, rather than putting up that celebrity hollier than thou, picture perfect status. And I believe him to my core. I'd like to ask though, why he was dragged through the mud, but t.v. shows like Maury Pauvich don't even receive a slap on the wrist for what I have seen them pull. They did a show on child pornography with the children, the parents that let them, and the agents/photographers as guests. The entire hour long show was constantly without a break, flashing closeup pictures of little girls dressed scantilly, posing in provocative positions, wearing make up, etc. It was so bad, that I had to turn the channel, because they kept showing photo after photo, non stop, almost like they were promoting it , rather than stating that it was a bad thing. One could've taped that show and had enough photos to never have to look on the internet!!! It was so overdone with the never ending photos that I cannot beleive that they got away with it, and without someone screaming about it, beside me. Any way, thank you for this site And thank you Pete, for EVERYTHING you are and everything you've done. You took the time to personally write to your fans when you didnt have to, and that meant the world to me- and to this day, even 20 or so years later, you are still very close in my heart. jade. U.S.A. |
| - Alexis S.- Roanoke, VA (hey yall) |
| Dan - San Diego |
| Anyway, the Guardia-Observer UK has been writting this up for months; this issue that is. And funny thing; a web site which has very close to childporn which I'm told was on 60 Minutes (cintythemodel.com or Cindythemodel.com??) is located in ... Texas. Features lots of money for no or almost no investment by the sleazoid operator. He shoots sexually provocative in a very sly way pictures of little girls who are clothed. Have to remember that what would be sexually provocative of a child would NOT be the same as sexually provocative of an adult. So, these children, who think this is their big chance to pose for a "real" photographer, and be "real" models have no idea how these poses look to a pederast. One which bothered me most I think was one of a frail looking girl alone on an escalator in a shopping mall. Gee, look at this one and pretend to abduct her? Shit, they ALL bothered me. For ONLY $150- the guy will take an order from a customer of an outfit for whichever girl chosen, and shoot pictures of the kid in the clothing. Not sure if the kids get money for this or not, but am certain he takes the largest part off the top. Funny how he knows just how to pose the kids AND that the site which PeteTownsend was busted for visiting is located as well in... Texas! Gee, can it be a coincidence? Think that there might possibly be a competent investigation of this in this country (particulary THAT state right now) without fucking it up?? THAT would really astonish me. I don't believe they DO catch these people. I have never heard of it, only of "posession of photographs/ magazines" or missing kids. Have to say the UK seems to have a more realistic ideaology on the predators sprung loose. Something about perhaps implants of a tracking device or something. Because those people NEVER do get over it. They always go back. Hey - ThANKS! Jane - NYC |
| Of course, this is eclipsed by the headlines of a few weeks ago; perhaps even this positive article is also being too sensational in the other direction. Simply with his pattern of behavior and now, it seems, even disclosure to the proper channels, this just looks like he was trying a right thing in a very visibly wrong manner. Thanks for everything, Pete |
| |
| Russ |
| Paul Mi |
| Ken, I can't speak for everyone here but I take the name of this site as meaning something different than you. I take it to mean, "Pete Townshend is innocent of being a pedophile." As you point out, I don't think there's much discussion over whether Pete broke the law. And as I have stated elsewhere, it may not matter to the police or to the law, (or you Ken) how much child porn Pete has on his site but it matters to me. A small amount supports his claims. A large amount does not. As for the act of giving $29.95 to people who do purely evil things--consider this. If I give you $29.95 to help you run a business and then turn around and give twenty or thirty times that to an agency whose sole purpose it is to shut you down, am I a supporter of yours? Or just the opposite? This is not to make light of your feelings. We are all struggling with exactly why Pete did what he did-- research for a book, research for his own psyche as to why he may have been abused, morbid curiosity...who the hell knows. I personally just believe that this man, whose career I have followed so closely could not enjoy a sexual perversion that is so harmful (yes it is evil, and disgusting, but the most ANTI-PETE thing is that it is HARMFUL). It's just NOT what he has been about. Doesn't mean I am right and/or that Pete is not a pedo but its a little like someone coming up and saying the world is not round. It's just too hard to believe and not because I enjoy his music. I repeat--ITS JUST TOTALLY AGAINST WHAT HE'S STOOD FOR--for all his life. No, he's no saint but he's basically, overall proven to be a man of compassion and concern for the less fortunate. Shaun |
| Richard |
| "On one occasion I used a credit card to enter a site advertising child porn. I did this purely to see what was there." Therefore, one can presume that he viewed images of child porn and therefore he did download it. Your Fact page may really mean to say that he didn't save any images to his computer hard drive, but we don't even know this for certain. More importantly, again from Pete's admission -- he paid for child porn. When one pays money to pornographers, it's safe to assume that they'll use a portion of this money to support themselves and also some portion to produce more child porn. This is a very obvious and bad thing. I'm not able to get past this inescapable conclusion and therefore can't conclude as you have that Pete is innocent. Regards, Ken |
| Dan in San Diego |
| Cliff in Mentor, Ohio |
| |
| "Blossom" |
| is extremelly cruel deal us another hand lord this one is very hard thank you vry much for your support to pete sid |
| Paula |
| |
| Pete has been an inspiration and hero to me since 1970 and my heart goes out to him in this dreadful misrepresentation of events. I am sure this articulate genius given a fair chance will rehabilitate the damage done and restore his good reputation which is what I believe would be a victory for common sense, justice and perspective. Received my copy of The Who in Maryville in the Post this morning which was my first visit to America and the highlight of 2002 and like Swansea 76,Wembley 79,Birmingham 82,Live Aid 85,London 2000 my motivation was the creative talent and admiration I have for this great great artist. Our prayers are with you Pete Please give Pete a chance Mick The Who - Dublin, Ireland |
| I am also genuinely afraid that the pressure could push him over the edge and pray that he can remain sober during this period and that he doesn't get to a point where he feels it's all too much for him. So many people have spoken up for him - even the media have been on his side for the main part rather than condemning him out of hand. I had my own accidental but very chilling brush with porn a couple of years back. I have two young sons of my own and one day I was searching for Pokémon sites using MSN and Yahoo search engines. I clicked on the link to the second site which came up in the search and was immediately confronted with a pornographic video of someone giving a man a blow job. I checked in the website source and they'd put words like Pokemon, Barbie, Power Rangers etc in the metatabs!! These b***ards had deliberately targeting young children looking for stuff on their favourite TV programme. What's more - as I tried to close it more and more pages of filth popped up. It just goes to show how you can't avoid this stuff So anyone who tries to get rid of such filth is OK with me! Jane A. From Bracknell, Berks England |
| My Name Is Kitanoo(Japanese) I Believe Pete too... Kitanoo from Japan |
| Lenny S., Huntington WV |
| I SUPPORT PETE! Kevin from Maine |
| I have absolute faith in Pete Townshends motives. He is a man of exemplary character and his track record clearly exonerates him. Louise |
| I have seen the Who at every venue in every town I could. Every night when I come home , I have the pleasure of looking at my Woodstock tickets on my mantle. I also was lucky enough to see Tommy on Broadway twice. Pete - please take heart and know we care Veronica |
| i support him with no doubt! michal G. |
| Michael from michigan, there hey donn't ya know |
| Shaun T. |
| thank you david |
| Joan-Barcelona Spain. |
| Lara in Knoxville |
| God Bless Pete Townshend. Sincerely, Elizabeth Pa |
| Mike. |
| (RE: PETE) He is a genuinely good man and my hero, and I hate to see him being dragged through this bullshit. The picture of him leaving his house was awful. Very composed, but his eyes showed it all. I'm really thankful for this site, you've done a great job. I emailed a little bit of venom to the paper in Texas that wrote that shit article, and I'll hit the others later. Anything else useful that can be done, let me know. I hope this whole mess comes to the proper conclusion soon, and Townshend can put this behind him. Kevin |
| Thanks for putting up this site. I'd been feeling a bit lost as I don't know many Who/Pete fans in my real life. It's been great to see so much support online and I hope that it continues no matter what the future brings. As Pete said in September at the concert in Toronto: "With all the low things in the world come all the high things. You've got to look under the rock to find the goodness." I hope Pete gets some of those high things soon!! Sniff (North of Toronto) |
| Hi, I´m a Who fan from Spain. I´ve come to this site thanks to www.oddsandsods.imdanet.com , and I am very glad to see we (all Who fans) are getting organiced. Me, in Spain, claims Pete´s innocence to everybody too.I think the best to do is to send " A different bomb" to everybody, and now I got your direction too. We must end with this injustice. Rubén M Madrid, Spain |
| Again, our clean world and the press need a victim. If it wasn't for Pete, it would've been someone else. Pete's exposed himself perhaps a little too much with all his charities for children and statements in "Different Bomb". He made the world focus him. If he is guilty, he is as "guilty" as any of us. While they are busy with Pete, the big fish fiddle on! The sad thing is the damage that is done to his always excellent and spotless reputation. A gentleman like Pete Townshend never deserved all this. Never ever in a lifetime! I give him all my support. Good Luck Pete, stay a warrior! Alex/Switzerland 21.1.03 |
| I will use all of the resources that are provided here and I will not go away. Jon - Auburn Hills MI |
| My advice is: I think you have to be careful saying "Innocent until proven guilty" or things of that nature. It may be the case that Pete is found, or even pleads guilty to the crime charged. But this issue doesn't rest with that. Its whether his fans, family, and friends believe his reasons for entering the site. We can't let it be that a "guilty" equals pedophile. In other words, he may be technically guilty, but not a person interested in this terrible material. Just a thought. Keose |
| Roy G. |
| For being a Who-fan for 30 years, the news about Pete struck as lightning and the very thought of him doing such a thing made me sick to my stomach. I truly believe (however stupid it was to do a thing like that) his explanation and hope that he will come out of this as unharmed as possible. I recently called up the editor for a Swedish newspaper and gave him hell for the coverage of this matter, his London based reporter just seemed to cut, copy and paste outtakes from tabloids like The Sun, making Pete look real bad (haven 't read anything since..)! I' ve been a lurker of the Odds & Sods mailing list for a couple of years (never posted anything though as i'm not much of a writer and the things I want to say is often already better said by someone else) and have met some from the list when The Who played in London 2000 (attended all three shows), and I am overwhelmed over the support and commitment he has (keep it up guys)! This campaign should be called: Clear him, don't smear him! Best regards and keep it up! Anders aka. The Arctic Seeker |
| Kathleen M |
| kevin |
| Deb and Athena (I guess) |
| christian & shari |
| Brian in Atlanta |
Lilac6420 |
| BACK | MAIN |